Telescope vs Camera Lens – Astrophotography

This site contains affiliate links to products. I may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

If you want to try astrophotography and already own a DSLR camera with the lens, you may ask yourself if it is worth upgrading to a telescope. Telescope vs. camera lens is a common question of beginners in astrophotography, so let me explain the difference.

The telescope is very similar to a camera lens. Telescope has a fixed focal ratio, and with few exceptions, it ranges from F4 up-to F15. Camera lenses have a focal ratio from less than F2 to more than F32. The image quality for astrophotography is better with a telescope than a camera lens. Also, you can get a more accurate focus with the telescope than with the camera lens.

The camera lens is mostly used in wide-field astrophotography of the night sky, and the telescope is used for imaging deep-sky objects like nebulae and galaxies.

Telescope Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • made for astrophotography
  • high magnification
  • better image quality
  • big aperture
  • long focal length
  • can be used for visual astronomy
  • can be used with different filters
  • very accurate focus

Cons:

  • can be big and heavy
  • expensive accessories
  • needs sturdy computerized mount

Camera Lens Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • small and compact
  • cheap
  • build-in field flattener
  • zoom feature
  • adjustable aperture
  • perfect for wide-field images of the milky way
  • can be used for daytime photography
  • most people already own one

Cons:

  • hard to focus
  • low magnification
  • can’t photograph planets
  • comatic aberration
  • problem with filters

Telescope or Camera Lens For Astrophotography?

If you already own a DSLR with any lens and you want to try astrophotography, then you should try it first with what you have. You don’t need to buy a telescope straight away.

You can do pretty well with the basic camera lens, and because astrophotography is not only about the equipment, you will learn a lot. It will help you when you switch to an astrophotography telescope later.

You get familiar with taking all the calibration frames, you will master the stacking software for deep-sky objects, and you will learn a lot about the astrophotography in general. It is an expensive and complicated hobby, so it is a good idea to dive in slowly.

However, if you have a budget for a telescope and love astronomy, then go ahead and buy a telescope because you will get much better results, and you can also use it for visual astronomy. You can check my article about the best telescope for astrophotography to decide which telescope to buy.

Telescope vs. Telephoto Lens

There are few types of lenses like a wide-angle lens, prime lens, zoom lens, macro lens, standard lens, but the closest you can get to a telescope performance is the telephoto lens.

The telephoto lens has a longer focal length than a standard lens. For example, the Super Telephoto lens goes over 300 mm. The telephoto lens body is shorter than its focal length, something like Schmidt Cassegrain telescope design.

The downside of the telephoto lens is that it can be more expensive than a telescope. So if you already have one, cool you can use it. But if you are asking me what to buy for astrophotography, telescope, or telephoto lens, then the answer is easy. Buy a telescope. Here is my article to help you with that on what to look for when buying a telescope.

You should start with a telephoto lens if you have one because the experience and the results will be closer to a telescope experience than any other type of lens.

You can watch Trevor’s video from Astrobackyard to see what you can do with a telephoto lens here:

Telescope vs. Camera Lens For Planets

The problem with lenses, and it doesn’t matter what type, is that it is almost impossible to do planetary imaging. Planets are very small, and to photograph even the biggest like Jupiter or Saturn, you need high magnification, which means a very long focal length.

It is simply not possible with camera lenses. So, if you are interested in planetary imaging or to shoot close-ups of the moon craters, you definitely need a telescope. And not a small one. The best option for planetary imaging is the Schmidt Cassegrain telescope.

But it is also possible with shorter focal lengths telescopes using the Barlow lens.

Motorized Mounts For Telescope and DSLR Camera

No matter what you plan to use for astrophotography, telescope, or camera, you need a motorized mount. A motorized mount is compensating for the earth rotation so you can take long exposures that are essential in astrophotography.

The design of the mount you need is called the equatorial mount. There are also alt azimuth computerized mounts, but they are not suited for astrophotography.

Mount For a Telescope

The German equatorial mounts for astrophotography are starting at around $700. You can check my article about the best telescope mount for astrophotography. The widely used mount for beginners is Celestron Advanced VX Computerized Mount. You can find it on Amazon or any telescope retailer.

Mount For a Camera

In recent years the market has skyrocketed with star trackers for DSLR cameras. Now you can choose from different brands that are manufacturing mount dedicated to DSLR cameras and small refractors.

These mounts are small and compact, perfect for travel and camping trips under the dark sies. One of these mounts is iOptron SkyGuider Pro Camera Mount with iPolar Electronic Polar Finder. An excellent mount for your DSLR with just a lens.

The 500 Rule – No computerized mount, only tripod, and camera.

But what if you have only a camera with a lens and the tripod. Can you still try astrophotography if you don’t have a star tracker? Yes, you can!

To take a long exposure with your camera on a static tripod, you need to know the limit of the exposure where you start getting star trails. To calculate that, you can use the 500 rule.

This rule is more of the guideline, and you should experiment with the exposure to see what you can do.

To calculate the 500 rule, you have to use this equation:

500 / (CF x FL)=SS

SS – shutter speed or exposure time

CF – crop factor of the camera sensor

FL – focal length of the lens

So for the camera like Canon T3i that I’m using a lot, the maximum exposure time with 50mm focal length lens is as follow:

500/(1.6×50)= 6.25 seconds

This tells me that I can shoot maximum exposure of 6.25 seconds on a fixed tripod without getting star trails. But it is more rule of thumb than a rule set in stone. It’s only a guide, and the real-world results may warry.

Conclusion

As you can see, you can use a camera lens for astrophotography if you don’t own a telescope yet. You can try it and learn just with the camera and lens, but if you are serious about astrophotography, you have to upgrade to a telescope at some point.

To take images of the deep-sky objects, you need a telescope. But if you are only into wide-field photography of the milky way over the landscape, you can stick to a camera lens because the camera lens is a better option, and you don’t need a telescope for that.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top